But investigators found additional documentation tying Kessler's account to the later upload.
The original scanned signature appeared in multiple places.
A document analyst determined that the contested signature image had likely been copied from another source rather than created through a fresh physical signing on the recorded date.
That conclusion didn't identify the person who performed the copying.
But it substantially undermined the document's authenticity.
Combined with the death record and audit history, the evidence supported a serious allegation of falsification.
Nadia's team continued tracing the approvals.
They also examined whether Bell and Kessler knowingly permitted the documents to support enforcement actions.
The investigation was becoming far more significant than the original rose-garden complaint.
Victor Harland was interviewed after investigators completed an initial review of the financial records.
He arrived with counsel and appeared outwardly calm.
He wore an expensive navy suit and spoke with the polished confidence of someone accustomed to negotiating municipal contracts.
Nadia began by asking about Greenway's legitimate operations.
Victor described the company's work.
Vegetation clearance.
Debris removal.
Property maintenance.
And emergency cleanup after storms.
The investigator acknowledged that the company performed real services.
Then she asked about the visibility initiative.
Victor explained that the city identified qualifying properties and Greenway handled approved corrective work.
Nadia placed several records on the table.
The first concerned Margaret Ellis.
The second involved Ruth Daniels.
The third contained the Lorraine Monroe complaint.
She asked who verified the underlying violations.
Victor said the municipal code office.
Nadia asked who prepared the preliminary submissions.
He acknowledged that Greenway employees could do so.
She then asked why the company submitted cases identifying deceased or absent homeowners as consenting parties.
Victor hesitated.
He said he wasn't involved in individual paperwork.
Nadia nodded.
Then showed him the approval chain.
His operations manager's account appeared repeatedly.
Several disputed cases generated revenue for the company.
And invoices associated with those cases were approved through the municipal program.
For several seconds, Victor stared at the documents.
Then he looked toward his attorney.
The interview continued.
But the easy confidence with which he began had disappeared.
The financial investigation eventually identified payments that required criminal scrutiny.
The evidence indicated that certain contractor revenues flowed through Briar Compliance Partners and other entities before reaching individuals connected to municipal enforcement work.
Some transactions reflected legitimate services.
Others lacked credible supporting documentation.
Investigators compared payment dates with enforcement incidents and contractor billing records.
Several payments occurred shortly after disputed property removals.
In some instances, the amounts were linked to work categorized as high-priority compliance activity.
The pattern suggested that people involved in approving or supporting enforcement could have benefited financially from increased contractor activity.