But what the ground crews found when they inspected the bomber explained why they could not believe it had crossed the water at all.

Chapter 8

Theme:
Font Size:
24px

The opposite decision also had logic.

The fire had diminished.

The B-17 remained controllable through the automatic system and trim.

Some engine power remained.

The crew could continue generally toward England.

Every minute of successful flight reduced the amount of hostile territory between the men and safety.

A bailout would create separate emergencies for every crew member.

One man could strike part of the aircraft while leaving.

Another parachute could fail.

A crewman could suffer injury on landing.

Wind could scatter the men.

German troops could capture them.

A wounded crewman might not be physically capable of a safe jump.

Staying aboard kept the group together and preserved a chance of reaching Allied territory.

Douglas therefore did not need certainty that he could reach England.

He needed only to believe that remaining with the aircraft was still better than abandoning it at that moment.

Then he had to make the same judgment again several minutes later.

Emergency decisions are often described as if they happen once.

In reality, Douglas was effectively renewing the decision throughout the flight.

The aircraft remains controllable, so continue.

The fire has gone out, so continue.

Altitude is decreasing, but the coast is closer, so continue.

Another engine weakens, but the bomber is still flying, so continue.

The Channel appears, so continue.

England appears, so find a field.

The choice to remain aboard was therefore not one dramatic gamble.

It was a chain of smaller judgments.

Any new failure could have ended that chain immediately.

Colonel Hunter had his own reason to understand the risk

Frank P. Hunter Jr. was an experienced officer.

The August 1 mission was one of a series of combat leads he flew with the 398th. A later group history lists Villaroche as the tenth of his seventeen officially credited lead missions. His final combat mission would come on January 23, 1945, when his B-17 was hit while leading the group against Neuss, Germany. Hunter was killed in that loss. 

That later fate should not be used to turn the August flight into a prophecy.

Hunter did not know in 1944 how his own war would end.

It does, however, remind us that surviving one extraordinary mission did not remove these men from danger.

There was another briefing afterward.

There were other targets.

There were other formations.

The war did not reward a crew for surviving once by guaranteeing a future.

Captain Douglas also returned to combat.

On November 26, 1944, he was aboard another B-17 during a mission over Germany when his aircraft was shot down. Surviving records identify Douglas in the Missing Air Crew material for that mission. He survived and became a prisoner of war. 

Keith Anderson continued flying as well.

The men who escaped 43-37892 did not become museum figures on August 2.

They returned to the system that had placed them over Villaroche.

That fact can be difficult for modern readers to absorb.

A flight dramatic enough to become the central event in a later memoir could be only one mission in a combat tour.

After the medical checks, reports, questions, and replacement arrangements, military life moved forward.

Another airplane took the place of N8-L.

Another target appeared on a briefing-room map.

Another set of engines started before dawn.

The bomber itself had been with the unit only a short time

Aircraft 43-37892 had not accumulated a long combat biography before August 1.

The 398th's aircraft-history material shows it arriving in the unit during July and completing only a handful of missions before its loss. The aircraft table records approximately 20 days with the group and four missions before August 1. 

That creates another contrast with the reputation of the Flying Fortress.

The type became famous for durability.

Individual aircraft could still have very short lives.

The U.S. Naval Institute notes that 12,726 B-17s were built and that the type's fame came partly from its ability to absorb damage, although bomber losses remained severe despite heavy defensive armament.

The reputation was therefore statistical and cultural.

It did not mean every B-17 returned.

Many did not.

It did not mean a badly hit Fortress was safe.

It meant the design sometimes continued flying after damage that appeared impossible from outside.

43-37892 belonged to that category for one afternoon.

Its strength created time.

Douglas and the crew turned that time into distance.

The distance eventually became enough to reach England.

Then the aircraft's usefulness ended.

There is something fitting about the bomber being salvaged only days later.

Its survival did not mean it was secretly healthy.

The wheels-up landing had not proven that the damage was minor.

The aircraft had simply delayed its final failure until its human cargo no longer needed it.

What the B-17's systems tell us about the return

The technical design of the B-17 helps explain why Douglas could improvise as he did.

The B-17G used four Wright R-1820 radial engines.

Its landing gear and wing flaps were electrically operated, while the brakes and cowl flaps used hydraulic power. The aircraft also carried automatic flight-control equipment. Wartime pilot manuals describe these systems separately, which is why a general claim that the bomber survived by fighting “dead hydraulics” misses the central problem in this particular event. 

Flight-control damage was more dangerous.

Cables ran through the fuselage to transmit pilot input.

A shell fragment passing through the waist could cut or partially damage those connections even while leaving the cockpit itself intact.

News in the same category

But what the ground crews found when they inspected the bomber explained why they could not believe it had crossed the water at all.

20 Part