One hidden maneuver turned a brutal day at Point Pleasant into a battlefield reversal few saw coming

Chapter 1

Theme:
Font Size:
24px

The move that finally changed the battlefield at Point Pleasant did not begin with another charge against Cornstalk's line.

It began by moving men away from it.

Late on October 10, 1774, after hours of fighting along the wooded bottomland between the Ohio and Great Kanawha rivers, Colonel Andrew Lewis had already seen repeated direct pressure fail to break the Native position. His Virginia militia had suffered heavily. His brother, Colonel Charles Lewis, had been mortally wounded near the beginning of the battle. Colonel William Fleming had been hit several times. Colonel John Field had also fallen. By the end of the day, approximately 75 Virginians would be counted killed or mortally wounded and about 140 wounded, roughly 215 casualties from a force of only around 800 men actually present at Point Pleasant when the fighting began.

Cornstalk's warriors had suffered too, but they had not collapsed.

They had begun the morning trying to surprise the Virginians before Lewis could unite with Lord Dunmore's larger northern army. When that surprise was partially lost, they still attacked hard enough to drive the first Virginia detachments backward. As the day continued, Cornstalk's men gave ground deliberately, using trees, logs, creek banks, dense vegetation, and broken terrain as cover. By afternoon, according to contemporary Virginia accounts, they had reached a strong defensive position from which Lewis's officers considered another direct assault dangerously costly.

The famous traditional account of the battle says Lewis then approved another solution.

Companies associated with Isaac Shelby, George Mathews, and John Stuart were withdrawn from the visible fighting line. Instead of advancing directly toward Cornstalk, they moved back toward the confluence, used the high riverbank and vegetation along the Kanawha as cover, reached the vicinity of Crooked Creek, and followed the low ground until they could emerge beyond part of the Native position.

From Cornstalk's side, men who had seemed to leave the fight were suddenly appearing in a different direction.

Later accounts say some warriors believed the new force might be the advance of Colonel William Christian's reinforcements, which Cornstalk knew were somewhere behind Lewis. The appearance of armed Virginians on or near the rear and flank therefore threatened to transform a long, bloody stalemate into something far more dangerous. Cornstalk's force began withdrawing toward the Ohio, using darkness to cross back toward the western side of the river.

That is the traditional ending of the Battle of Point Pleasant.

It is also the point where careful history requires a qualification.

Isaac Shelby wrote a detailed letter only six days after the battle. In that near-contemporary account, he described the fighting continuing until roughly half an hour before sunset, after which Cornstalk's warriors escaped under the protection of approaching darkness. Shelby did not present a dramatic rear attack as the single event that suddenly routed them. Modern scholarship likewise emphasizes that the Native withdrawal came after a full day of fighting, heavy pressure, a gradual Virginia recovery, movement around Crooked Creek, and the knowledge that additional militia under William Christian was nearby.

The flank movement should therefore not be treated like a magical maneuver that instantly decided an otherwise unwinnable battle.

It was more important than that in another way.

It changed the tactical problem confronting Cornstalk at exactly the moment when remaining on the field was becoming increasingly dangerous.

To understand why, the battle has to be reconstructed from the beginning.

Point Pleasant was not supposed to become the decisive battlefield

The men who arrived at the confluence of the Ohio and Great Kanawha rivers in October 1774 were not expecting to fight the major battle of Lord Dunmore's War there.

Point Pleasant was supposed to be a concentration point.

Virginia's royal governor, John Murray, fourth Earl of Dunmore, had organized a two-part campaign against the Shawnee and their allies in the Ohio Country. A northern force under Dunmore would approach from the upper Ohio region. A southern division under Colonel Andrew Lewis would march through the mountains and down the Great Kanawha.

The two forces were ultimately intended to move against the principal Shawnee settlements in the Scioto Valley.

The strategic idea was straightforward.

Rather than continue reacting to raids on scattered frontier settlements, Virginia would take a large militia army across the Ohio and carry the war directly toward Native towns.

Cornstalk understood what that meant.

If Dunmore and Lewis joined, their combined force could outnumber the warriors available to oppose them by a wide margin. Modern research places the Native force Cornstalk assembled for Point Pleasant at roughly 800 men, with contemporary estimates ranging upward. Dunmore's northern wing and Lewis's southern army, once united with additional reinforcements, could field several times that number.

Cornstalk therefore faced a strategic problem familiar across military history.

He could allow two enemy armies to combine and then confront the larger force.

Or he could attack one before the junction occurred.

He chose the second option.

That decision is the real beginning of the Battle of Point Pleasant.

The war grew from a much older struggle over the Ohio Valley

The fighting of 1774 did not begin because two armies unexpectedly encountered each other in the wilderness.

It grew from competing claims to an enormous region west of the Appalachian Mountains.

After Britain's victory over France in the Seven Years' War, British officials attempted to reduce frontier warfare by issuing the Royal Proclamation of 1763. The proclamation restricted colonial settlement west of a boundary roughly following the Appalachians.

The restriction did not stop colonial land hunger.

Speculators, surveyors, hunters, and settlers continued looking west.

Virginia in particular asserted enormous territorial claims under its colonial charter, while powerful individuals inside the colony expected to benefit from western land.

Then came the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768.

British officials negotiated with representatives of the Six Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy and obtained recognition of large land cessions south of the Ohio River.

For many Virginians, that agreement helped open what would become Kentucky and portions of present-day West Virginia to settlement and speculation.

The Shawnee saw the matter differently.

They used much of the territory south of the Ohio for hunting and did not accept that the Six Nations possessed legitimate authority to surrender those Shawnee interests.

The land therefore existed simultaneously inside incompatible political maps.

To Virginia land companies and settlers, treaty agreements had opened it.

To Shawnee communities, outsiders had negotiated away country they did not own.

Neither interpretation remained theoretical for long.

Settlers moved west.

Survey parties crossed mountains.

Hunters followed river valleys.

Cabins appeared.

Native hunting parties encountered growing numbers of outsiders.

Animals were taken from the same hunting country.

Roads and trails expanded.

Each new settlement reduced the distance between communities already distrustful of one another.

Violence followed.

By early 1774, frontier tension was already dangerous

Shawnee war parties and Virginia frontier communities had experienced cycles of conflict before 1774.

Memories of the French and Indian War and Pontiac's War remained fresh.

Families on both sides could name relatives killed in earlier violence.

Rumors traveled faster than verified information.

One isolated killing could become a story of a planned invasion.

One retaliatory raid could trigger another.

By early 1774, British officials were receiving reports of increasing Shawnee activity against frontier settlements. Virginia's political representatives described the situation as increasingly dangerous. Governor Dunmore ordered militia preparations.

Then a group of colonial settlers committed an act that intensified the crisis dramatically.

On April 30, 1774, men led by members of the Greathouse family killed a group of Mingo at Baker's Bottom near Yellow Creek on the Ohio.

The victims included relatives of the Mingo leader Tah-gah-jute, better known to English speakers as Logan.

The killings were not a battlefield engagement.

The Mingo victims had been lured into a setting where they were attacked.

Later accounts differed in exact casualty numbers and details, but the event became one of the most important immediate catalysts of the war.

Logan responded with revenge raids against frontier settlements.

His war parties killed settlers and took captives.

Fear spread rapidly.

Virginia militia forces mobilized in greater numbers.

The struggle expanded beyond one revenge campaign.

The frontier moved toward general war.

Cornstalk did not enter the conflict as a man looking for a glorious battle

Hokoleskwa, known in English as Cornstalk, was one of the most influential Shawnee leaders of the period.

Later American memory often reduced him to the image of a fearless war chief shouting encouragement during Point Pleasant.

His political position was more complicated.

Cornstalk understood the numerical and material strength Virginia could mobilize.

He also understood the danger to Shawnee towns if a large colonial army crossed the Ohio.

He participated in the war because Shawnee territorial interests were under direct pressure, but surviving sources also show him attempting negotiation at various moments and later arguing that continuing resistance against overwhelming numbers could destroy Shawnee families.

That mixture of resistance and pragmatism shaped his decision at Point Pleasant.

His goal was not simply to kill as many militiamen as possible.

He wanted to disrupt the invasion.

If Lewis's division could be destroyed or badly damaged before it joined Dunmore, Cornstalk might restore a balance that made further negotiations possible.

If Lewis and Dunmore united unopposed, the Shawnee settlements around the Scioto would face an army large enough to threaten their homes directly.

The battlefield at Point Pleasant mattered because it offered Cornstalk a chance to prevent that junction.

Dunmore divided his force for operational reasons, but division created opportunity

Governor Dunmore's campaign was large by the standards of Virginia's frontier wars.

His northern wing gathered around Pittsburgh and Wheeling before moving west.

Andrew Lewis assembled the southern force at Camp Union, near present-day Lewisburg, West Virginia.

Lewis's command contained militia from Augusta, Botetourt, Fincastle, Bedford, and other western Virginia communities, together with smaller independent groups.

Many of the men were experienced woodsmen.

Some had fought in previous frontier wars.

Several officers would later become important figures during the American Revolution or early United States history.

They were not regular British infantry.

They were local militia operating far from settled supply centers.

The southern route was difficult.

Lewis's men had to move supplies, cattle, packhorses, ammunition, and equipment through mountainous wilderness.

The army followed the New River and Kanawha corridor toward the Ohio.

Roads in the modern sense barely existed.

Steep banks and narrow paths forced columns to compress.

River crossings slowed movement.

Cattle and pack animals had to be kept together.

A military force approaching one thousand men could not pass quietly through this landscape.

Cornstalk's scouts monitored the march.

Native observers could use high ground and woodland routes inaccessible to the large Virginia column.

By the time Lewis reached Point Pleasant, Cornstalk had a reasonably good understanding of where the southern army was.

Lewis did not possess equally precise information about Cornstalk.

That difference in intelligence helped create the conditions for October 10.

Lewis reached Point Pleasant on October 6

The location was geographically distinctive.

The Great Kanawha River flowed northwest from the interior of Virginia and entered the Ohio at a sharp point of land.

Water protected two sides.

Wooded bottomland extended back from the confluence.

Small streams and uneven ground cut through the area.

Crooked Creek entered the Kanawha above the point.

To men expecting to wait for a friendly army, the place seemed defensible.

Lewis established his camp there on October 6 with roughly 800 men immediately available.

Colonel William Christian followed behind with several hundred additional militia, supplies, cattle, and pack animals.

Christian's absence would become extremely important.

Cornstalk knew those reinforcements existed.

If he attacked too late, Lewis's strength would increase significantly.

Lewis also received changing instructions from Dunmore.

The governor had altered the original rendezvous plan and wanted Lewis to cross the Ohio and join him closer to the Shawnee country.

That meant the southern division could not remain indefinitely at Point Pleasant.

Cornstalk had a narrow window.

On October 9, he acted.

Cornstalk crossed the Ohio before the Virginians realized an army was near them

The Native force approached the eastern side of the Ohio under cover of darkness.

Accounts describe warriors using rafts to cross upriver from Lewis's position.

Later histories sometimes give very precise numbers of rafts, but the central fact is not disputed: Cornstalk successfully moved a large body of warriors across one of the major rivers of North America without Lewis's camp recognizing that a major enemy force was assembling only a short distance away.

The force included primarily Shawnee and Mingo warriors, with smaller participation attributed in various contemporary sources to Delaware, Wyandot, and other Ohio Country peoples.

Exact strength remains disputed.

Some nineteenth- and twentieth-century accounts placed Cornstalk's army at 1,000 or 1,200.

Isaac Shelby, writing six days after the battle, believed the force contained at least 800 and perhaps 1,000.

Modern Encyclopedia Virginia research uses approximately 800.

The safest conclusion is that Cornstalk's force was probably comparable in size to, and perhaps initially somewhat larger than, the troops Lewis had immediately available.

Cornstalk intended surprise.

He wanted to approach the Virginia camp before full daylight, overwhelm or disorganize Lewis's army, and prevent a combined invasion.

Had the plan worked perfectly, the geography of Point Pleasant might have turned against Lewis.

The Virginia camp stood between two rivers.

A successful Native attack pressing from the north could trap the militia against the Ohio and Kanawha.

The water that appeared to protect the camp could become a barrier to escape.

Cornstalk was not merely attacking an enemy army.

He was attempting to use the point itself as a trap.

A few hunters disrupted the planned surprise

Early on October 10, before the main camp was fully alert, several Virginia militiamen went out to hunt.

Accounts differ over their exact number and identity, but one or more of them encountered Cornstalk's advancing warriors.

One hunter was killed.

Others escaped and ran back toward camp.

Their warning arrived shortly before sunrise.

The battle was not prevented.

The surprise was only reduced.

Lewis still did not know how large the enemy force was.

He appears initially to have believed he was dealing with a reconnaissance party or limited raiding force rather than most of Cornstalk's available warriors.

He therefore ordered two detachments forward to investigate.

One column contained around 150 men under Colonel Charles Lewis, Andrew Lewis's younger brother.

News in the same category

One hidden maneuver turned a brutal day at Point Pleasant into a battlefield reversal few saw coming

20 Part